{"id":739,"date":"2017-09-19T13:54:30","date_gmt":"2017-09-19T13:54:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/staffblogs.le.ac.uk\/waughandwords\/?p=739"},"modified":"2025-02-26T13:22:17","modified_gmt":"2025-02-26T13:22:17","slug":"an-oxford-quarrel-evelyn-waugh-and-hugh-trevor-roper","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/staffblogs.le.ac.uk\/waughandwords\/2017\/09\/19\/an-oxford-quarrel-evelyn-waugh-and-hugh-trevor-roper\/","title":{"rendered":"An Oxford Quarrel: Evelyn Waugh and Hugh Trevor-Roper"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Portrait<\/a>Ahead of our Waugh’s Enemies <\/a>event on Monday 25 September, Milena Borden gives a brief history of Waugh’s hostile relationship with Hugh Trevor-Roper – and asks what it tells us about Oxford’s post-war battle of ideas.<\/h3>\n

 <\/p>\n

There is no shortage of writing on the feud between Evelyn Waugh and Hugh Trevor-Roper. Most of it has tended to focus on Waugh\u2019s hostile letters to Trevor-Roper and their incompatible characters. But what about looking into the story as a guide to the battle of academic ideas in Oxford after the end of the Second World War?<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The son of a country doctor, Trevor-Roper read for two degrees, Classics and History, at Christ Church (1932 – 1937), became a Research Fellow of Merton College in 1938 and from 1957 until 1980 was Regius Professor of Modern History at Christ Church.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Historian Hugh Trevor-Roper, pictured in 1975. Source: Wikicommons<\/p><\/div>\n

During the Second World War he was a code-breaker and also became an expert on Germany. One year before his retirement, he accepted to be Master of Peter House at Cambridge. In 1980 Trevor-Roper concluded his valedictory lecture with the words of Evelyn Waugh during one of their public spats twenty-six years previously: \u2018One honourable course is open to Mr Trevor-Roper. He should change his name and seek a livelihood at Cambridge.\u2019 He expressed regret that Waugh was no longer alive to enjoy his victory. Trevor-Roper was an admirer of Waugh as a prose writer, but was afraid to meet him in person because of their intense intellectual animosity.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Trevor-Roper\u2019s first book The Last Days of Hitler<\/a> (1947) became famous. It was enthusiastically reviewed and praised by established Oxford historians including Alan Bullock, Lewis Namier and Lawrence Stone. But one aspect of his book provoked angry reactions in Catholic circles. It claimed that Goebbels, the Minister of Propaganda in Nazi Germany, learned how to manipulate knowledge during his Jesuit education. Trevor-Roper also wrote that Himmler was like Cardinal Robert Bellarmine, known for his role in the Giordano Bruno and Galileo Galilei affairs, because they both were kind to animals.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Trevor-Roper’s The Last Days of Hitler (1947) erroneously claimed Goebbels was educated by Jesuits.<\/p><\/div>\n

Waugh first wrote to Trevor-Roper privately and then made a public accusation in The Tablet<\/a>. He accused him of seeking to promote his own prejudice in a sensational book: \u2018There was not the smallest reason why Mr. Trevor-Roper should introduce Catholic theologians into this nasty story\u2026They are dragged in ignorantly, maliciously and irrelevantly.\u2019 But most importantly, it was Waugh, who first suggested that Trevor-Roper should make a correction in the next edition of the book. At the end, the New York publisher of The Last Days of Hitler<\/em> demanded changes under the pressure of American Catholics and Trevor-Roper made some corrections in the second edition of 1950. In its preface, he specifically apologised for a factual inaccuracy: \u2018\u2026I must admit an error in my description of Goebbels. I stated that he was educated by the Jesuits. Though this is widely believed and repeated, I am satisfied that it is untrue, and that Goebbels learnt that brilliant casuistry that could distinguish between \u201cconcrete truth\u201d and \u201cpoetic truth\u201d from other sources.\u2019<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

So, what does this quarrel tell us about Waugh, Oxford, and the bigger question – \u2018What is history?\u2019. Is it factual, unemotional and secular or is it inductive and tainted with beliefs, and religious faith? Waugh, a devout Catholic, argued against the idea that fascism could be linked to his religion, whereas Trevor-Roper – a staunch anti-Catholic \u2013 understood and accepted criticism only if it was on the ground of academic accuracy. Waugh extended his absolute disdain for the historical empiricism of\u00a0C. R. M. F. Cruttwell, his history tutor at Oxford, to The Last Days of Hitler<\/em>, the book, which A. J. P. Taylor called \u2018a delight for historian and layman alike\u2019. The quarrel reached a point where all could enjoy the infinite view of history debates at Oxford.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

At the time of posting there are still a few places available for Waugh’s Enemies. Visit our eventbrite<\/a> page now to join Alexander Waugh, Ann Pasternak Slater and\u00a0Barbara\u00a0Cooke in picking over Waugh’s hit-list.<\/em><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Literature<\/h3>\n

Adam Sisman, Hugh Trevor-Roper: The Biography, 2010.<\/p>\n

Martin Stannard, Evelyn Waugh: No Abiding City 1939 \u2013 1966, Volume II, 1993.<\/p>\n

The Tablet, 28 June, 1947.<\/p>\n

H. R. Trevor-Roper, The Last Days of Hitler, 1947; Second Edition, 1950.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Ahead of our Waugh’s Enemies event on Monday 25 September, Milena Borden gives a brief history of Waugh’s hostile relationship with Hugh Trevor-Roper – and asks what it tells us about Oxford’s post-war battle of ideas.   There is no shortage of writing on the feud between Evelyn Waugh and Hugh Trevor-Roper. Most of it […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[9,18,8],"class_list":["post-739","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-guest-writers","tag-evelyn-waugh","tag-fascism","tag-oxford"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/staffblogs.le.ac.uk\/waughandwords\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/739","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/staffblogs.le.ac.uk\/waughandwords\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/staffblogs.le.ac.uk\/waughandwords\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/staffblogs.le.ac.uk\/waughandwords\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/staffblogs.le.ac.uk\/waughandwords\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=739"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/staffblogs.le.ac.uk\/waughandwords\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/739\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":749,"href":"https:\/\/staffblogs.le.ac.uk\/waughandwords\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/739\/revisions\/749"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/staffblogs.le.ac.uk\/waughandwords\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=739"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/staffblogs.le.ac.uk\/waughandwords\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=739"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/staffblogs.le.ac.uk\/waughandwords\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=739"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}