{"id":303,"date":"2017-04-05T15:25:48","date_gmt":"2017-04-05T15:25:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/staffblogs.le.ac.uk\/museumstudies\/?p=303"},"modified":"2025-02-26T13:17:23","modified_gmt":"2025-02-26T13:17:23","slug":"hooray-for-the-national-trust","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/staffblogs.le.ac.uk\/museumstudies\/2017\/04\/05\/hooray-for-the-national-trust\/","title":{"rendered":"Hooray for the National Trust"},"content":{"rendered":"

There are many things in life that one should really rise above and not respond to. One such thing, in my humble opinion, is the Daily Mail. But this morning I took the unusual step of actually reading something in the Mail (don’t worry, I thoroughly washed my hands afterwards) \u2013 an article that was highly critical of the National Trust<\/a>.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

In it, the writer, one Harry Mount, criticises the Trust\u2019s Egg Hunt over Easter weekend, which I\u2019m sure you have read about in the press over the last day or two (it was a story that even caught the Prime Minister’s eye<\/a>), but goes on to criticise the Trust for \u2018dumbing down\u2019, having a \u2018childish world view\u2019 and the inevitable allegations of \u2018political correctness\u2019.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

So what are the evils perpetrated by the Trust to deserve such attacks?<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Railings near\u00a0the Palladian Bridge at Prior Park, Bath. Perhaps the very railings that scandalously housed a poster for an upcoming event. (Image \u00a9 National Trust)<\/p><\/div>\n

Well, apparently they have dared to put up posters for their events. This seems to be a key criticism that Mount returns to again and again. \u2018Advertising\u2019, he says, \u2018trumps beauty\u2019. Well, I dare say that the railings at Prior Park<\/a> do look better without a poster, but as man cannot live by bread alone, the Trust cannot draw life merely from the beauty of its railings. More and more of us in the museum and heritage sector know and have experienced the pain of cuts, and the resultant imperative to be more commercially active. Hooray for the National Trust and their attempts to raise the money that will enable them to preserve and give access to our beautiful buildings and landscapes for generations to come<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

OK. That\u2019s posters. What else? Oh, a sign that indicates that Osterley Park<\/a>\u00a0\u2018welcomes dog walkers\u2019. Why do we need this, asks Mount. Dog walkers and runners \u2018already know that they can freely do these things\u2019. Do they? Do they really? I must get a dog or take up running. I had no idea that psychic ability was bestowed upon canine-loving and sporty types. The point here is that lots of people do not know that they are welcome. They often think such places are not for them. They are sometimes intimidated by them, often they might just think they have to pay to go in. There are many reasons why people may not visit. Hooray for the National Trust letting them know that they are welcome.<\/strong><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Now then, what comes next? Oh yes, Prejudice and Pride<\/a>, the Trust\u2019s project to expose the stories of LGBT people at some of their properties. This is not our first run in with the Daily Mail on this issue<\/a>. We, at the School of Museum Studies, are proud to be part of this project, working with the Trust to support them in this endeavour. It\u2019s breaking ground for the Trust and for many museums who do not tell (some even actively conceal) LGBT stories. These stories deserve to be told as much as anyone else\u2019s. It is so important for LGBT people (and other minorities) to be able to find their stories represented in museums, historic houses and other sites. LGBT people exist too. Don\u2019t try and airbrush them out of history. Their stories matter. Hooray for the National Trust being pro-active in uncovering and telling these stories<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Back at Prior Park, Mount is perturbed to find a sign which invites visitors to \u2018think how each area of the garden makes you feel\u2019. He seemingly doesn\u2019t like feelings<\/em> or the idea that \u2018religion, facts, history and beauty fall victim to political correctness and emotional responses\u2019. But what is beauty if not an emotional response? Are our responses to stunning works of art (or houses, or pieces of furniture or objects and artefacts) dispassionate? Of course they are not, our responses to such things are full of emotions. At a very simple level, whether we like or dislike something is an entirely emotional response. Thinking about emotions is a brilliant way of engaging people more deeply with their history and heritage. Hooray for the National trust supporting people to have interesting, stimulating, emotional experiences at their properties.<\/strong><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Just up the road from us here at Southwell Workhouse<\/a>, according to Mount, the Trust had a Christmas event at which visitors were \u2018invited to \u201csing along with the pauper choir\u201d\u2019. Mount doesn\u2019t say why this is bad (you might have thought he would applaud a Christmas event, given his vociferous opinion on Easter Eggs), but he does tie it in with Halloween events and a Cluedo-themed events at other properties, which are, apparently, examples of \u2018replacing history with childish fantasy\u2019. Well, to me they are examples of ways in which we can engage new audiences, invite people to come together and participate and celebrate in their heritage. Things they might not otherwise do. Hooray for the National Trust creatively engaging new audiences, giving life to properties and making the Trust more sustainable for the future<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The article also accused the Trust of becoming an eco-charity. The evidence for this? The Trust\u2019s director, Helen Ghosh<\/a>, saying that \u2018Extreme weather is the largest threat to our conservation work\u2019. Well, anyone with a basic knowledge of conservation will know the potential effects of extreme weather. Heat, water, very high, low or rapidly fluctuating relative humidity are key agents of decay. Our changing climate is an issue for all museums, in terms of how they can be more sustainable, but also in how they rise to the challenges that climate change brings. Hooray for the National Trust being aware of, and thinking about how they, in line with their mission, and in the light of these challenges, can preserve our heritage for future generations<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

And finally, what of the Egg Hunts? Well, it strikes me that if you participate in a hunt for chocolate eggs on Easter Sunday, it\u2019s really up to each individual whether they choose to associate that with the resurrection of Christ or not. For myself, I\u2019ll just enjoy the chocolate if that\u2019s OK, Harry.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

I have not always been the greatest fan of the National Trust, but right now I see a rapidly changing organisation that is not only preserving the past, but it is making it more and more accessible to more and more people and thinking about and addressing important contemporary social issues.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The end result should be more and more people are able to appreciate, engage with and understand their heritage. And if that is the case, then, one last time, I say \u201cHooray for the National Trust<\/strong>\u201d.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n